On structural change: practice organizations and institutional logics

نویسندگان

چکیده

Abstract This essay explores structural changes in practices through a convergence between particular version of the institutional logics approach theory and my own account social practices. Part one presents these approaches as contemporary versions idea that objective, or common, contentful orientations govern The discussion elucidates practice organizations arrays such how they shape human activity, criticizing cognitivism name more practical relationship structuring contents two describes both accounts treat activity responsible for governing orientations. Whereas logicians focus on types action concatenations conditions under which bring about changes, highlights sorts nexuses chains materiality responsible.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Simulating Structural Change in Adaptive Organizations

This paper presents an agent-based model of an organization. The model is made of a social network—composed of the different organization workers—and a knowledge network. Workers are assigned tasks, for which they have to use information in the knowledge network. We have modeled the quality of the information by assigning each information item a probability of being wrong. Agents can interact w...

متن کامل

Theorizing Hybridity: Institutional Logics, Complex Organizations, and Actor Identities: the Case of Nonprofits

We propose a novel approach to theorizing hybridity in public and nonprofit organizations. The concept of hybridity is widely used to describe organizational responses to changes in governance, but the literature seldom explains how hybrids arise or what forms they take. Transaction cost and organizational design literatures offer some solutions, but lack a theory of agency. We use the institut...

متن کامل

Reflections on Institutional Theories of Organizations

Contemporary institutional theorizing in the field of organizations dates back thirty-odd years. This particularly describes what are called new or neo-institutionalisms. These terms evoke contrasts with earlier theories of the embeddedness of organizations in social and cultural contexts, now retrospectively called the ‘old institutionalism’ (Hirsch & Lounsbury, 1997; Stinchcombe, 1997). They ...

متن کامل

Structural Change and Homeostasis in Organizations: A Decision-Theoretic Approach

We present here a decision-theoretic framework for the analysis of organizational change under risk. An algorithm is demonstrated which identifies optimal change paths given uncertainty involving execution time, intervention cost, and payoffs resulting from particular structural configurations. An elaboration of the basic framework to accommodate external structural perturbations is shown, and ...

متن کامل

Institutional Logics and Institutional Pluralism : The Contestation of Care and

We are grateful for the many scholars and medical practitioners who helped with our research. We thank the editor, Mauro Guillén, three anonymous reviewers who helped to substantially improve the paper, the participants of the EGOS 2007 Subtheme on Professions, the Boston College Research Workshop 2008, and the following people who provided helpful comments on prior drafts of our paper: Forrest...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Österreichische Zeitschrift Für Soziologie

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['1862-2585', '1011-0070']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11614-023-00537-z